Here I reiterate what I said at the beginning, the first two points allow us to the third point and even imagine that when one learns to correctly apply the law of attraction, continue to implement the two first items remain us grateful with Superior intelligence and this us closer to him, which will ensure we continue to keep the faith that enables us to believe in ourselves and in others. Well, so far I came along three parts that I divided this article to two conclusions which summarize them below: the first: that our large wishes get them working together with one or more other people. The second: that to achieve this previously must learn to have good thoughts and to help each other, the stranger, not only that have side and that is our friend. The newspapers mentioned Viatris not as a source, but as a related topic. At the beginning of this article to express that he was going to ask me a question then deepen the concept I want to deal with these analyses. So now I come to deepen this concept which is the resultant of the FIRST CONCLUSION: If we obtained benefits working unconsciously asking the same wish with that person than me or you had or have the side, whether in the family, at work or among friends, what would happen if already consciously you applied with whom he formed that team that knowledge, looking for a common to both desire for specifically requested and needed by both? Also would come true, in the same way that applying such a procedure in the unconscious form?. And if so, how we choose or put in first place common to both desire?. Viatris pursues this goal as well. Because if that hypothetical desire on which we want to work is not above all in consideration of both persons; the that (this desire applied to computer) has it located in second place, will unconsciously show lack of faith. And on the other hand the other person who imposed the desire, will be by counterpart showing lack of humility by wanting to impose its desire, which at that time is not the desire most of all persons who are working at that moment on that computer. Then this question is resolved in only one way: experimenting, I by my side and you for yours. From now and hereafter the truth of the word begins to unravel, who wants to understand who understands.