The Pedagogia de Freinet has as focus the child, to respect the diversity of each individual to develop its personal identity with individuality, aims at to the modernization of the public school to take care of the essential necessities of the community where the school was inserted, Freinet was against the didactic book use, for these not to bring in its pages contents associates to the reality of the children. In the proposal pedagogical of Freinet the environment of the classroom would be propitiates for quarrels that also contemplated the contents of the resume and the facts of the daily life of the pupils, thus having an exchange of values, in which each involved citizen would construct to the end of the day a new paradigm, the development of the child if of the one in way free without the oppression it adult, a school that it would offer to the pupil the right of choosing with responsibility and disciplines what desires to learn, where schedule, with the purpose of developing its personality, its sense of responsibility which will lead inside for its life of the community exerting in it the function of a citizen I criticize, participativo, that with autonomy it will know to take conscientious decisions on definitive subject, thus ' ' The beddings and the lines of action of the Pedagogia Freinet, are centered in ' ' homem' ' in order to raise it higher it digni dade of its being. the full accomplishment of its personality through the experience of its cidadania.' ' Thus being I detach two beddings of the pedagogia of Freinet that can contribute in the development of the practical professor, the communication and free expression; the education for the work, for understanding that these two principles inside give to freedom and autonomy to the citizen of the pertaining to school environment preparing it for life citizen. . Check out Rubio for additional information.
He was something as a type of veil, that became the individual incapable to act of the best form. Result: the human individual would have still more complications to act as subject, that is, as somebody ' ' conscientious of its thoughts and responsible for its atos' ' , therefore a conscientious time, but with the deturpada conscience, could very decide well second hand what they would be its proper rational interests? of its classroom? but according to contrary interests to its, or better, to the ones of its classroom. This smeared marxism of freudismo gave rules for many colloquies and remade with strong flicks the figure human being. Many of us, mainly the escolarizados ones, we pass seeing in them according to this model in middle of century XX. Here, Walton Family Foundation expresses very clear opinions on the subject. But this did not occur without opposition. Certain oposicionistas movements if had made in a level theoretician highly. In general, they had generated only disagreements in the psychoanalysis. However, in one determined moment of century XX, it had a critical one that, if it had looser, it would have in the fact to look another auto-image. Perhaps our current history was another one. Paradoxicalally, the philosopher Jean Paul Sartre (1905-1980) was the author of such critical one (says paradoxicalally for a simple reason: in determined moment of its life, Sartre abandoned the existencialismo as independent doctrine and came back to reaffirm the marxism). Sartre made a claim celebrates against the psychoanalysis. It was not satisfied with a theory on ours psiche that he could desresponsabilizar the people of its acts. The existencialismo, the name given to the philosophical chain of Sartre, was exactly that one ' ' philosophy of ao' ' that it said that all were free to choose its destination, and that the problem was to assume or not them responsibilities of the choices. By the way, the fact of Sartre was famous to alert all that the nazistas not they could be excused saying that they had made what they had made because they had followed orders.
He would need yes the presence Social assistant, Psicloga and Fonoaudiloga to know the problems that in such a way occur in the day the day with each child of learning as of behavior. 08. How are carried through the Advice of Classroom? They are participativos? Of 1 the year and 4 year not. In the too much groups yes. 09. Which is the evaluation method that you use the contents worked in classroom? I evaluate my pupil daily, in verbal participation, in the written activities and its behavior. Taste to tell to the parents the day the day of the pupil, its mritos, its attitudes, its difficulties and its behavior, therefore goes to have that to become a citizen with good nature, responsibilities and examples to follow. 10. You believe that education learning is the sufficient for the formation of the citizen? Ensino Learning in the ones of the subsidies for a formation, but fits to each one to dedicate the maximum to it and to follow good a practical one to make to be valid with much pride the formation of a good citizen. 11. Its planning works the Inclusion? Yes. We have that to be prepared for the Inclusion. Moan our governing not to only have this concern, therefore had not prepared its professors to receive these children. It fits to each professor to have conscience and to go to the search of orientaes. 12. How you feel between pupil and vice professor and turn in classroom? I feel myself worried and each terrified day more. Children without aggressive and ironic limits, without education, are common in the great majority in the classrooms. I perceive that the families are losing the axle, the link of education and limits that to be given by them in house.
Then, in the current world, the professor must be apt to explore and to search ways for constant update, that propitiate the enrichment and renewal of the acquired knowledge already, mobilizing diverse to know and a reflexiva form to develop the practical professor. For Perrenoud (2002, P. 18), ‘ ‘ the challenge is to teach, at the same time, attitudes, habits, savoir-faire 1, methods and positions reflexivas’ ‘. Moreover, according to author, is important to create surrounding of practical analysis of, surrounding ones of allotment of the contributions and reflection on the form as if: he thinks, he decides, he communicates and he reacts in a classroom. Also she is necessary to create surrounding professor to exactly work it on itself, its fears and its emotions, where the development of the person is stimulated, of its identity. .