Bacteria Against Cold

Instead of hot lemon or chicken broth advises nutrition expert Micheal Dennard to drink with sauerkraut and bread to be better prepared against colds, influenza and the flu. Sauerkraut and bread drink contain abundant bacteria. They have the false reputation of the pathogen, because some of these microorganisms even protect against disease, white medicine journalist Dennard. The nutrition expert with the Center for Nutrition communication and health journalism (CEC) makes in light of the upcoming cold and flu epidemic points out that only build probiotic bacteria to promote health intestinal flora. The term probiotics is now part of ordinary language has become. Probiotic means "for life" and thus the opposite of antibiotics. Probiotics are microorganisms – usually lactic acid bacteria – to survive the passage through the digestive tract largely to the large intestine, settle here and develop health-promoting effects. In particular, they protect our bodies against invasion by pathogens. They are an important part of the intestine-associated immune system, which is the largest immune organ in the human body. Who wants to be spared from colds, the recommended Micheal Dennard daily bread drink two glasses. Optimal is when it is enriched with vitamin-rich sea buckthorn juice and honey bees kaltgeschleudertem. Sea buckthorn juice is a real vitamin bomb and unheated honey has an antibacterial effect. A special bread is the main product for the sour-tasting bread drink. It contains plenty of bread probiotic lactic acid bacteria. ARD-health expert Professor Hademar Hofer describes the bread as the elite troops of the lactic acid bacteria probiotic effective microorganisms.

Bonn Tel

Clinical study on the VCU study involved 16 participants. To the subjects consumed alternately a cigarette of their favorite brand, as well as electric cigarettes the two US market leader. The participants were asked to take just 10 trains. After the nicotine levels in the blood, the heart rate and the desire were measured for an another cigarette over a period of an hour. Surprising results provided little to no nicotine both electric cigarettes. The medium nicotine level never rose above 3.5 ng/ml. For comparison: nicotine measured was a regular smoked tobacco cigarette around 20.0 ng/ml. The subjects also indicated that cigarettes nicotine hardly or not at all reduce the subjective desire after a new cigarette, or a new dose. In fact one of the reduced two tested Ecigarette brand desire although statistically significant, however by far not so much like a regular cigarette. Study design correctly chosen? Prof. Dr. Eissenberg admits, however, that the results against the background of the test scenario with a defined and limited number of trains (10) to evaluate are, which do not necessarily reflect a real usage situation. He does not exclude that the electric cigarette in the reality in longer trains of more intense and frequent use provides very much larger amounts of nicotine. Taking into account this fact and other factors, the needs continue to investigate these electronic nicotine delivery devices is evident”. Regulation although no nicotine was Dr. Eissenberg remains challenged, considers that the marketing and sales of the electronic cigarette should be regulated. He criticized that the electrical cigarette in shopping malls and on the Internet is freely available and is subject to any State control. From his point of view is this practice contrary to other surrounding off nicotine products such as nicotine gum or nicotine patches, are subject to the all State regulations. “Other researchers disagree with study results Dr. Ben Thomas, another American expert in the field of smoke research contradicts the main finding, that the smoke” a cigarette contains no nicotine: we know that the customers of electric cigarettes inhale nicotine. This was confirmed by separate investigations of both the manufacturer and the FDA itself. Against this background, it is highly unlikely that any relevant dose of nicotine in the inhalant is contrary to the results of the VCU study “.” Contact: Markus Kreusch Blog: Bonner Talweg 52 D-53113 Bonn Tel.: 0228-30408925