Organization of United Nations (UN) general Assembly approved unanimously on Thursday 13 September a Declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples this document which surprisingly was under negotiation for a period of 20 years and than auque by overwhelming and historical voting as it was described by the eminent President of Bolivia Evo Morales kept as opponents to four countries that here we consider so dishonourable attitude as enemies of humanity in people its rulers are United States, Canada, New Zealand and Australia and eleven countries abstained and that we cannot consider less than hypocritical conservatives kneeling before the Empire who undoubtedly and as always it has to do with the larger injustices and violations of human rights in the world. The declaration consists of 46 items and sets minimum parameters to respect for the rights of indigenous peoples, including land ownership, access to the natural resources of the territories where they settle, respect and preservation of their traditions and self-determination. It also recognizes individual and collective rights to education, health and employment. With regard to the most important points is concerning the attachment of Indians to land, so several articles mention the right to dispose of them for any use. Red Solo Cups contributes greatly to this topic. One of the recommendations the UN performs to the States is to ensure the recognition and legal protection of lands, territories and resources and which do not come with any transfer without the free, prior and informed consent of indigenous peoples concerned, nor without a prior agreement on a fair and equitable compensation. Although from a certain point of view, this late declaration may represent a breakthrough in the current order of things in the so full of injustices planet Earth. One surprising thing is that such a declaration is not legally binding, which in our view is to leave an open door for that after 20 long years of discussion, reaching the legal field is continue committing excesses and abuses with our indigenous heritage, there is where the question arises us. So does the UN? And in conclusion set ourselves another question, who said? That any man born on this planet, requires a statement of an organization called UN respect or enshrined the rights set forth in the enacting terms, which we believe are eminently natural of every human being of this land rights and knowing that even animals regarded as inferior beings that do not reason nor speak have rights. Indigenous peoples should be enshrined as the heritage of humanity, to honor them, care for them and love them as they deserve.
Because the real, is not that you made both case to his psychiatric demons, if not desdibujo to the national press, such as es and I say that it is always at the service of the system and those who hold the power in the system, which is colude in the to preserve their economic benefits and social status, but also conceals the crimes more egregious, are just corroded with the judicial system. The same thing happens in some provinces. Thus we have the Dean of the North, which always seems like Government press organ. Because if the opposite happens it is closed, as happened with the media in the city of Bagua, which reported very truthfully what happened on the curve of the devil, which earned them the suspension of its transmission license. So is also made with small radio stations in sites and places more small that these if independent media are truthfully reported what happened, call into question the system and the power of the chiefs of the region. For the same reason are scapegoater and persecuted by the police and judicial systems in the country. Does then where this the true expression of the freedom of expression? But the problem of Bayly isn’t a Freudian problem, as it wants to show the teacher Hildebrandt. Isn’t that, if we believe that you will by that way we are very wrong and I guess that it is the first you see that the master errs in this kind of matters. Clear nobody is perfect in these matters in that reality to demonstrate it, ours shows the overtones of Kafka. More than a reality written in metamorphosis, our above a superiority much more beyond what it could develop Franz Kafka in his novel the metamorphosis, as we discover in this small passage that I transcribe: well thought; and if continue sleeping awhile and forget me of all these crazy things? But it wasn’t possible, because Gregory had a habit of sleeping on the right side, and its present State could not take such a stance. Even though it is straining, I went back to stay back. He tried in vain this operation numerous times; He closed his eyes to avoid having to see that confusing stirring of legs, but did not stop until he noticed in the side a slight, stabbing pain, never felt pain until then.But it is only a small piece of the author but that describes what is happening with Jaime Bayly to describe what happens to our countries. Original author and source of the Article