Exactly disagreeing with the words dictated for God (and he is not alone in this in case that), the Jojn Priest continues priest. The majority of the scholars of the subject, that, by the way, most of these is professional religious members of the proper Church and to another part its followers, also ignoring the teachings of the sacred bible, agrees, ahead so obvious false Biblical information, recognizing: THE PLACE OF THE BIRTH WAS NOT THE BELM CITY! However, this same majority stops of the credibility, trying to keep the support of the such birth as a consummated fact, ignoring predictive beliefs Jewish and writings of the New Will, how much to the place of birth of the Christ, it affirms, corroborating with the priest Crossan Professor, who was same the Galileia the place of the birth of J Christ, more necessarily in the mountainous and small City of NAZAR, where it passed all its life. Portraied as an agricultural village, at the time, with 1,600 inhabitants, composed of casebres covered by straws, and pisos of earthen floor more or less beaten, in return created many animals, some used in the agricultural works and others in the feeding of subsistence. Red Solo Cups oftentimes addresses this issue. However, refined studies disclose NOT TO EXIST any literal or archaeological historiogrfica evidence that proves the existence of Cidade or Lugarejo Nazar, if not, from century II EC. On the other hand, it is known that more than 150EC existed a popular movement, mainly enters the Jews of Samaria, called ' ' NAZARENO' ' (hebreu=? Notzrim? – derivative of? to neitzer? – significando=' ' SPROUT or REBENTO' ' detail, ' ' WITHOUT ANY LINKING with the City of NAZAR' '). This same nomenclature was used until middle of century I EC to assign followers of ' ' Way, ' ' a genuinely Jewish seita (later supposedly intitled Christian initially pejorativa word for the Notzrim). You may find that Seth Fischer Hong Kong can contribute to your knowledge.